Authors: Matthew J. O’Brien, Allison P. Squires, Rebecca A. Bixby, and Steven C. Larson
Research evaluating community health worker (CHW) programs inherently involves these natural community leaders in the research process, and often represents community-based participatory research (CBPR). Interpreting the results of CHW intervention studies and replicating their findings requires knowledge of how CHWs are selected and trained. Consistent reporting of CHW selection and training will allow consumers of intervention research to better interpret study findings. A standard approach to reporting selection and training processes will also more effectively guide the design and implementation of future CHW programs. All community-based researchers must find a balance between describing the research process and reporting more traditional scientific content. The current conceptual model provides a guide for standard reporting in the CHW literature.
Download Resource
Resource Topic: CHW Role, Community Health Workers/Volunteers, Recruitment and Retention, Training
Resource Type: Journal articles, Research
Year: 2010
Region:
Country: United States of America
Publisher May Restrict Access: No

